Federal judges across the country have flexed their authority at President Donald Trump as he moves to rapidly reshape the government.
The Supreme Court justice didn't name Trump, but her public remarks come as his administration has several legal issues headed toward her court.
Multiple executive orders signed off by Donald Trump have been temporarily halted with questions over whether they comply ...
Lawyers for South Carolina and Planned Parenthood are returning to the state’s highest court to argue how restrictive the ...
Supreme Court held that one-sided agreements are covered by definition of term ‘unfair trade practice’. Thus, refund of amount in excess of 10% of Basic Sale Price towards cancellation of Complainants ...
Sexual intercourse between a husband and his wife, who is not below 15, cannot be termed as rape as the absence of the woman's consent for an unnatural act loses its importance, the Chhattisgarh High ...
The Allahabad High Court has held that a Food Business Operator cannot be held responsible for quality of the raw materials used by him when the same have been bought from registered manufacturers ...
The Supreme Court’s decision to expand the definition of presidential immunity may have just caused a hiccup for Donald Trump ...
Law professors have long debated what the term means. But now many have concluded that the nation faces a reckoning as ...
New York University law professors Kenji Yoshino and David Glasgow analyze the meaning of “illegal DEI” in Trump’s executive ...
3. Whether a marriage performed according to customary rites and ceremonies, without strictly fulfilling the requisites of Section 7 (1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, or any other personal law ...
Prior to the Eleventh Circuit’s decision, the FCC had issued an order postponing implementation of its 2023 order for 12 months, until January 26, 2026. The Eleventh Circuit’s opinion rendered that ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results