Google seeks to hold tech giants accountable for recommendation algorithms in a complicated case that could see the Supreme Court meddle in more than 25 years of Internet policy Gonzalez v.

Content recommendation algorithms rule your digital life. The Section 230 case under review could change it all. This article is from The Technocrat, MIT Technology Review's weekly tech policy ...

Google has argued that the provision applies to this situation, while the Gonzalez family has countered that it should not apply to recommendation algorithms. Above, a representational image of ...

When the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals considered a lawsuit against Google in 2020, Judge Ronald M. Gould stated his view of the tech giant’s most significant asset bluntly: “So-called ...

They say their algorithm provides high-quality explainable recommendations on state-of-the-art real-world data sets, and that it reduces the recommendation unfairness in several key aspects.

Google, but in 2023, it dismissed the case without reaching a conclusion or redefining the currently expansive protections. Shumsky contended that algorithms’ personalized nature prevents them ...

Google also flagged a 2019 change it made to how YouTube’s recommender algorithm handles “borderline content” — aka, content that doesn’t violate policies but falls into a problematic ...